Voting Goes From Inalienable Right to Bragging Right
















A woman I went to high school with voted for Barack Obama today. I know this because she posted a picture of her ballot to Facebook (FB). She quickly deleted it—perhaps because, according to the Citizen Media Law Project, doing so in Illinois, where she lives, is actually illegal—but not before five other people took self-portraits of themselves wearing their “I voted!” stickers. Media outlets are in on the game, too; the New York Times is soliciting readers’ stylized Instagram photos while NPR wants to know what’s on people’s election-night playlist.


Do people make election-night playlists? Then how do they listen to Wolf Blitzer? This year, voting in America has moved from an inalienable right to a bragging right. It’s the democratic equivalent of telling everyone how well you’re sticking to your diet.













Social media has changed since the 2008 election, when Sarah Palin impersonations abounded on YouTube (GOOG) but the Internet had not yet become infatuated with sepia-toning its every move. There were 10.3 million tweets about the Denver presidential debate last month—of which, I admit, I contributed at least a dozen. That’s one tweet for every 14 people who reportedly watched it. Today, Facebook is tracking the number of people who clicked on its “I voted” prompt in real time. But how useful are these statistics? The site currently shows that only 8 percent of its self-identified voters are over age 55, while in 2008 that age group had a voter turnout of roughly 70 percent. And for some reason, nearly twice as many women have voted on Facebook as men. Maybe that’s because Lena Dunham has asked them to tweet pictures of the outfits they’re wearing to the polls.


In a way, this is an unofficial grassroots version of Rock the Vote, the nonpartisan organization that tried to get young people to the polls by making the democratic process seem cool. But can you actually guilt-trip someone into voting with a Thomas Jefferson quote translated into LOL-speak and a picture of a sticker? Or change someone’s mind with a grammatically incorrect, all-caps rant about a candidate? Who are these pictures for, anyway?


I can’t wait until next week, when we’ll go back to posting pictures of our lunch.


Businessweek.com — Top News



Read More..

Officials: New mass graves found in Ivory Coast
















ABIDJAN, Ivory Coast (AP) — Up to 10 new mass graves have been discovered near the site of a July attack on a camp for displaced people, officials said Tuesday, amid allegations that initial casualty totals were downplayed to mask killings carried out by the national army.


Rights groups claim summary executions were carried out by the Republican Forces of Ivory Coast, known by its French acronym of FRCI. Last month, officials found six bodies in a well close to the former campsite in the western town of Duekoue.













Government, army and U.N. officials toured 10 more graves in the same area on Saturday, said Paul Mondouho, vice-mayor of Duekoue. He said the graves had first been identified by civilians, and that officials did not know the number of bodies they contained because they had not yet been properly exhumed.


“People were suspecting the presence of bodies in these graves because of the smell coming out of them and because of the shoes we saw nearby,” Mondouho said.


Prosecutor Noel Dje Enrike Yahau, who is based in the commercial capital of Abidjan, confirmed that multiple new graves had been discovered but could not provide details. U.N. officials and the local prosecutor in charge of investigating the suspected killings could not be reached Tuesday.


U.N. spokeswoman Sylvie van den Wildenberg confirmed that U.N. forces helped Ivorian authorities secure a perimeter around 10 wells “similar to the one in which six bodies were found,” and that “some of those wells are suspected mass graves.”


She stressed that Ivorian authorities were leading the investigation but that the U.N. was able to provide assistance.


Army spokesmen could not be reached Tuesday. The Justice Ministry has previously vowed to investigate the discovery of the initial grave.


On the morning of July 20, a mob descended on the U.N.-guarded Nahibly camp, which housed 4,500 people displaced by violence in Ivory Coast, burning most of the camp to the ground. Officials said at the time that six people were killed.


The attack was prompted by the shooting deaths of four men and one woman on the night of July 19, according to local officials and residents. In response a mob of some 300 people overran the camp on the morning of July 20 after the perpetrators of the shootings reportedly fled there.


The victims in the July 19 attack lived in a district dominated by the Malinke ethnic group, which largely supported President Alassane Ouattara in the disputed November 2010 election. The camp primarily housed members of the Guere ethnic group, which largely supported former President Laurent Gbagbo.


Gbagbo’s refusal to cede office despite losing the election to Ouattara sparked months of violence that claimed at least 3,000 lives.


Albert Koenders, the top U.N. envoy to Ivory Coast, said one week after the attack that U.N. security forces had been inside and outside the camp at the time but that no Ivorian security forces were present. He said the U.N. forces decided not to fire at a large group of people that were attacking the camp in order to avoid “a massacre.”


Several witnesses have said soldiers and traditional hunters, known as dozos, participated in the attack on the camp. Both military and dozo leaders have denied the claims, saying they had tried to protect the camp.


In a statement released Friday, the International Federation for Human Rights, known by its French acronym of FIDH, said it had information — including the preliminary results of autopsies — confirming that the six bodies found in October were men who had been summarily executed by the army.


“The disappearance of dozens of displaced persons after the attack, as well as confirmation of cases of summary and extra-judicial executions, suggest a much higher victim rate than the official figures report,” said the organization, which counts Ivorian civil society groups among its members.


Duekoue was one of the hardest-hit towns during the post-election violence. The U.N. has established that at least 505 people were killed in and around the town, including during a notorious March 2011 massacre that claimed hundreds of lives and was allegedly carried out by fighters loyal to Ouattara.


Duekoue residents belonging to ethnic groups that supported Gbagbo have long complained about abuses carried out by the FRCI, with some pointing to the direct involvement of the local commander, Kone Daouda. FIDH said in its statement that Daouda had been transferred following the discovery of the grave in October, and called for him to be interrogated over the matter.


The group also said two FRCI members were being “actively sought” after failing to return to their barracks on Oct. 16, noting that they are believed to have fled to neighboring Burkina Faso.


Africa News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

HANNITY ON TWEET
















“I learned a big civics lesson today.” — Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity, who tweeted a picture of his filled-out ballot (for Mitt Romney, natch), only to learn that appeared to break the law in New York state.


David Bauder — http://twitter.com/dbauder













___


EDITOR’S NOTE — Election Watch shows you Election Day 2012 through the eyes of Associated Press journalists. Follow them on Twitter where available with the handles listed after each item.


Social Media News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Rare John Lennon letter to Eric Clapton up for auction
















LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – John Lennon held out the promise he could bring out more musical greatness in legendary guitarist Eric Clapton in a letter that could fetch as much as $ 30,000 when it is sold at auction next month, the organizers of the sale said on Monday.


The signed, hand-written letter by the Beatle, who died in 1980 at the age of 40, is one of a selection from some of the world’s great musicians that will go under the hammer in Los Angeles at the Profiles in History auction on December 18.













In a draft letter dated September 29, 1971, Lennon expressed his respect and admiration for British guitarist Clapton and suggested that they form a band together.


“Eric, I know I can bring out something great, in fact greater in you that had been so far evident in your music. I hope to bring out the same kind of greatness in all of us, which I know will happen if/when we get together,” Lennon wrote in the letter.


The letter will hold special significance for Beatles fans as auctioneer Joe Maddalena said it was widely known that there were problems in the Fab Four’s relationships with each other, and that Clapton had almost become a Beatle.


Clapton played in the Plastic Ono Band, formed by Lennon and Yoko Ono in 1969 before the breakup of the Beatles in 1970. He also played on the George Harrison song “While My Guitar Gently Weeps”, which was on the Beatles’ White Album.


“There was a point in time when George Harrison thought about leaving the band and his replacement was Clapton, so this letter is a link of what could have been,” Maddalena said.


The letter is one of 300 manuscripts and letters from literary, musical and political greats, that will be auctioned from the holdings of an American collector.


“What we know of history is from the written word, without these letters, it would all be verbal. It’s a really unique area of collecting as you’re getting a glimpse into people’s minds,” Maddalena said.


Other highlights include a handwritten letter from George Washington, with a pre-sale estimate of up to $ 300,000, and a Charles Dickens manuscript with an obituary of novelist William Thackeray, expected to fetch between $ 40,000 and $ 60,000.


Also on the auction block is a signed, handwritten letter from German composer Ludwig van Beethoven to Tobias Haslinger, a friend of his publisher, in which the musician discussed the second performance of his Ninth Symphony and the Missa Solemnis, two of his most revered works.


The letter, written in German, is undated, but both the Ninth Symphony and Missa Solemnis debuted in performances in 1824. Because of the rarity of the letter, it is estimated it will sell for between $ 40,000 and $ 60,000.


Other items going under the hammer include a signed letter in Russian by composer Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky, which has a pre-sale estimate of $ 10,000 to $ 15,000, and a letter by composer George Gershwin dated March 24, 1932, in which he compares his compositions “Rhapsody in Blue” and “An American in Paris”.


The Gershwin letter is expected to sell for as much as $ 3,000, according to the auction house.


(Reporting By Piya Sinha-Roy; editing by Patricia Reaney; and Peter Galloway)


Music News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Appeals court questions Arizona’s late-term abortion ban
















SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A federal appeals court panel on Monday sharply questioned lawyers defending an Arizona law that bans late-term abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy except in medical emergencies, which opponents say is the toughest in the United States.


In San Francisco, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case after it blocked the Republican-backed Arizona law from going into effect earlier this year. Three abortion providers challenged the law in court.













The Arizona law bars doctors from performing abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in medical emergencies, and could send doctors who perform them to jail.


The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing to stop the law, said it was more extreme than similar laws elsewhere, because the way Arizona measures gestation means it would bar abortions two weeks earlier than in other states.


Those states also set the limit at 20 weeks but have different ways to calculate gestation time. Arizona already bans abortions at the point of viability, when a fetus might survive outside the womb, generally at 23 to 24 weeks.


Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, a panel member appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, repeatedly expressed concern that the law might not afford women the opportunity to abort a fetus with birth defects in cases where the defects are not apparent until just before 20 weeks.


He also questioned the need to prohibit abortions at that stage of the pregnancy, especially for fetuses bound to develop “horrible birth defects.”


“They’re basically born into hell and then die,” Kleinfeld said. “I don’t see how the courts could act before viability” of the fetus.


“With due respect, that’s the woman’s problem,” responded David Cole, Arizona’s solicitor general. “She should have made that decision earlier.”


William Montgomery, the attorney for Maricopa County in Arizona who also defended the law before the appeals panel, said new medical evidence showed a fetus has the capacity to feel pain during an abortion at 20 weeks of development.


But Judge Marsha Siegel Berzon called that a “red herring” in terms of the constitutional questions the law raises.


The three-judge panel did not say when it could make a final ruling in the case. The U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion nationwide in 1973, but has allowed states to place restrictions on the procedure from the time of viability unless the woman’s health was at risk.


In July, days before the 9th Circuit panel blocked the law until it could fully consider the case, U.S. District Judge James Teilborg ruled that the Arizona measure was consistent with limits federal courts have allowed.


Talcott Camp, deputy director of the ACLU reproductive freedom project, said the Arizona law’s exception to allow late-term abortion applies only in immediate emergencies if delay can jeopardize a woman’s life or seriously harm her health.


“The medical emergency exception is truly, horrifically narrow,” she said in a phone interview. “This is a law that allows her to get an abortion only when she is in emergency crisis.”


Aside from Arizona, seven U.S. states have put laws into effect in the past two years banning late-term abortions, based on hotly debated medical research suggesting a fetus feels pain starting at 20 weeks of gestation, according to the ACLU.


(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Cynthia Johnston. Desking by Christopher Wilson)


Health News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Appeals court questions Arizona’s late-term abortion ban
















SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A federal appeals court panel on Monday sharply questioned lawyers defending an Arizona law that bans late-term abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy except in medical emergencies, which opponents say is the toughest in the United States.


In San Francisco, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case after it blocked the Republican-backed Arizona law from going into effect earlier this year. Three abortion providers challenged the law in court.













The Arizona law bars doctors from performing abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in medical emergencies, and could send doctors who perform them to jail.


The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing to stop the law, said it was more extreme than similar laws elsewhere, because the way Arizona measures gestation means it would bar abortions two weeks earlier than in other states.


Those states also set the limit at 20 weeks but have different ways to calculate gestation time. Arizona already bans abortions at the point of viability, when a fetus might survive outside the womb, generally at 23 to 24 weeks.


Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, a panel member appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, repeatedly expressed concern that the law might not afford women the opportunity to abort a fetus with birth defects in cases where the defects are not apparent until just before 20 weeks.


He also questioned the need to prohibit abortions at that stage of the pregnancy, especially for fetuses bound to develop “horrible birth defects.”


“They’re basically born into hell and then die,” Kleinfeld said. “I don’t see how the courts could act before viability” of the fetus.


“With due respect, that’s the woman’s problem,” responded David Cole, Arizona’s solicitor general. “She should have made that decision earlier.”


William Montgomery, the attorney for Maricopa County in Arizona who also defended the law before the appeals panel, said new medical evidence showed a fetus has the capacity to feel pain during an abortion at 20 weeks of development.


But Judge Marsha Siegel Berzon called that a “red herring” in terms of the constitutional questions the law raises.


The three-judge panel did not say when it could make a final ruling in the case. The U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion nationwide in 1973, but has allowed states to place restrictions on the procedure from the time of viability unless the woman’s health was at risk.


In July, days before the 9th Circuit panel blocked the law until it could fully consider the case, U.S. District Judge James Teilborg ruled that the Arizona measure was consistent with limits federal courts have allowed.


Talcott Camp, deputy director of the ACLU reproductive freedom project, said the Arizona law’s exception to allow late-term abortion applies only in immediate emergencies if delay can jeopardize a woman’s life or seriously harm her health.


“The medical emergency exception is truly, horrifically narrow,” she said in a phone interview. “This is a law that allows her to get an abortion only when she is in emergency crisis.”


Aside from Arizona, seven U.S. states have put laws into effect in the past two years banning late-term abortions, based on hotly debated medical research suggesting a fetus feels pain starting at 20 weeks of gestation, according to the ACLU.


(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Cynthia Johnston. Desking by Christopher Wilson)


Health News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Cashback credit cards ‘double’

















Cashback deals are becoming more common in reward schemes for credit card customers, research has indicated.













The number of cards on the market that carry the feature has doubled in two years, according to the report by financial research group Defaqto.


The report, commissioned by card provider Capital One, suggested that the growth had not been mirrored by other rewards features.


One expert has warned of the danger of choosing a card based on rewards.


Spending


The Defaqto report found that people in the UK could choose from about 245 different credit cards. About three quarters of these were regarded as standard, rather than platinum or gold, cards.


The most common features that these cards carried as customer rewards were points schemes and shopping rewards, that were each found on 20% of cards.


Air miles featured on 10% of cards, while 9% of cards had cashback rewards.


Cashback is the only one of these that has seen a big rise in the past two years, the report suggested. However, it still only features on 22 cards.


Each time the customer uses their card an amount of cashback is accrued. After a set period, usually annually or monthly, the cashback amount is paid automatically to the customer’s credit card.


Cashback amounts can vary between £1.10 and £36 for every £100 spent on the card each month.


“To make the card truly worthwhile a customer would need to spend well in excess of £1,000 per month, so these cards are most likely to appeal to the higher spenders,” the report said.


Habit


For many people this would require a change of habit, by using a credit card for everyday spending.


So, customers should be realistic about whether they would be happy to do this for the cashback rewards, according to Sarah Pennells, founder of the Savvywoman financial website.


“If people are used to paying for their shopping or fuel by cash, then they might not think about getting a credit card out,” she said.


Customers should consider the whole package being offered by a credit card provider when choosing a card, she added.


Cashback would only prove to be a benefit if borrowers paid off their credit card each month, or took advantage of longer interest-free periods, she said. Other considerations when shopping around for a card might include charges when using the card overseas, she added.


BBC News – Business



Read More..

Methane warnings ignored before NZ mine disaster
















WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — A New Zealand coal mining company ignored 21 warnings that methane gas had accumulated to explosive levels before an underground explosion killed 29 workers two years ago, an investigation concluded.


The official report released Monday after 11 weeks of hearings on the disaster found broad safety problems in New Zealand workplaces and said the Pike River Coal company was exposing miners to unacceptable risks as it strove to meet financial targets.













“The company completely and utterly failed to protect its workers,” New Zealand Prime Minister John Key said Monday.


The country’s labor minister, Kate Wilkinson, resigned from her labor portfolio after the report’s release, saying she felt it was the honorable thing to do after the tragedy occurred on her watch. She plans to retain her remaining government responsibilities.


The Royal Commission report said New Zealand has a poor workplace safety record and its regulators failed to provide adequate oversight before the explosion.


At the time of the disaster, New Zealand had just two mine inspectors who were unable to keep up with their workload, the report said. Pike River was able to obtain a permit with no scrutiny of its initial health and safety plans and little ongoing scrutiny.


Key said he agrees with the report’s conclusion that there needs to be a philosophical shift in New Zealand from believing that companies are acting in the best interests of workers to a more proscriptive set of regulations that forces companies to do the right thing.


The commission’s report recommended a new agency be formed to focus solely on workplace health and safety problems. It also recommended a raft of measures to strengthen mine oversight.


Key said his government would consider the recommendations and hoped to implement most of them. He would not commit on forming a new agency. Workplace safety issues are currently one of the responsibilities of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.


In the seven weeks before the explosion, the Pike River company received 21 warnings from mine workers that methane gas had built up to explosive levels below ground and another 27 warnings of dangerous levels, the report said. The warnings continued right up until the morning of the deadly explosion.


The company used unconventional methods to get rid of methane, the report said. Some workers even rigged their machines to bypass the methane sensors after the machines kept automatically shutting down — something they were designed to do when methane levels got too high.


The company made a “major error” by placing a ventilation fan underground instead of on the surface, the report found. The fan failed after the first of several explosions, effectively shutting down the entire ventilation system. The company was also using water jets to cut the coal face, a highly specialized technique than can release large amounts of methane.


The report did not definitively conclude what sparked the explosion itself, although it noted that a pump was switched on immediately before the explosion, raising the possibility it was triggered by an electrical arc.


The now-bankrupt Pike River Coal company is not defending itself against charges it committed nine labor violations related to the disaster. Former chief executive Peter Whittall has pleaded not guilty to 12 violations and his lawyers say he is being scapegoated.


An Australian contractor was fined last month for three safety violations after its methane detector was found to be faulty at the time of the explosion.


Australia / Antarctica News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

U.S. judge tosses Apple vs. Google lawsuit over patents
















(Reuters) – An Apple lawsuit against Google‘s Motorola Mobility unit over alleged patent abuse was thrown out on Monday just hours before trial, a setback for the iPhone maker in its efforts to gain leverage in the smartphone patent wars.


The two rivals were set to square off in a Madison, Wisconsin federal court over the library of patents Google Inc acquired along with Motorola for $ 12.5 billion in May. Apple Inc claimed Motorola‘s licensing practices were unfair.













However, late last week District Judge Barbara Crabb questioned whether she had the legal authority to hear Apple‘s claims, and on Monday she dismissed the case.


A Google spokeswoman said the company was pleased with the order, while an Apple representative declined to comment. In a legal brief filed after Crabb’s ruling, Apple contended that the judge does indeed have the authority to hear its claims.


Lea Shaver, an intellectual property professor at Indiana University School of Law, said a ruling against Google would have diminished Motorola‘s patents as an effective bargaining chip in settlement negotiations.


“This puts Apple back into the position it was before,” Shaver said.


Apple and Microsoft Corp have been litigating in courts around the world against Google and partners like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, which use the Android operating system on their mobile devices.


Apple contends that Android is basically a copy of its iOS smartphone software, and Microsoft holds patents that it contends cover a number of Android features. Microsoft is set for a trial against Motorola in Seattle next week in a case with similar issues as the Apple matter in Wisconsin.


Apple and Microsoft accuse Google of demanding too high a royalty for some of its so-called standard essential patents. Motorola promised to license those patents on fair terms, they argue, in exchange for Motorola technology being adopted as an industry standard.


In Wisconsin, Crabb had ruled during the run-up to trial that she might decide what a fair royalty for Motorola‘s patents should be.


However, in a court filing last week, Apple argued that it would not consider itself bound by Crabb’s rate if it exceeded $ 1 per Apple phone.


Given Apple‘s position, Crabb questioned whether she had the power to issue merely an advisory opinion. “It has become clear that Apple‘s interest in a license is qualified,” Crabb wrote on Friday.


Microsoft, by contrast, has agreed to live with whatever terms U.S. District Judge James Robart sets at the Seattle trial.


In Wisconsin, the trial was scheduled to begin Monday afternoon in Madison, but Crabb dismissed the case during a morning hearing. If Apple cannot convince Crabb to reconsider, then the matter could be appealed.


In its statement, Google said Motorola has long offered licensing at reasonable rates. “We remain interested in reaching an agreement with Apple,” the company said.


The case in U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin is Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility Inc., No. 11-cv-178.


(Reporting By Alexei Oreskovic in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Dan Levine in San Francisco; Editing by Leslie Adler and Tim Dobbyn)


Tech News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..

Dizzying array of media streams spotlight election
















NEW YORK (AP) — The days of watching Election Night coverage on a single television set may soon be a quaint anachronism.


Americans have an array of alternatives for following returns on Tuesday night. Television news divisions are throwing everything they have into the story. People will be able to construct their own media experiences, seek out desired information instead of waiting for it, participate in conversations and hear analysis that reflects their own perspectives or none in particular.













Virtually all of the media organizations covering the election promise an abundance of information available online, from interactive maps that display state-by-state results to data from exit polls.


It’s expected to be a huge night for social media. And news organizations say they will monitor the conversations and have their own journalists actively participate.


Entertainment News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Read More..